Comparative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy in Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorSabrina Domene
dc.contributor.authorManuel Quiroz Flores
dc.contributor.authorDaniela Fulginiti
dc.contributor.authorKarem D. Thomas Garcia
dc.contributor.authorNathnael Abera Woldehana
dc.contributor.authorKarleska M. Nunez Jimenez
dc.contributor.authorVíctor M. Lagos Herrarte
dc.contributor.authorJose A. Guevara Benavides
dc.contributor.authorCarlos R. Alegría Perdomo
dc.contributor.authorCesar Estrella-Gaibor
dc.contributor.authorVictor Sebastian Arruarana
dc.contributor.authorMarily Martinez Ramirez
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-14T15:13:29Z
dc.date.available2025-10-14T15:13:29Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractPancreatoduodenectomy, the primary surgical strategy for managing cholangiocarcinoma, is executed via two distinct methodologies, namely minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). The selection between these surgical options is critical, as it directly influences patient outcomes, encompassing both short-term recovery metrics and long-term survival rates. Despite the clinical significance of these procedures, there exists a notable void in the literature regarding a comprehensive comparison of MIPD and OPD, particularly in assessing their respective efficacies and complications. This lack of detailed comparative analysis has left a gap in evidence-based guidance for clinicians faced with the decision of choosing the most appropriate surgical approach for their patients. The absence of robust data comparing the two techniques underscores the necessity for a meta-analysis that rigorously examines and contrasts the outcomes associated with MIPD and OPD. By drawing upon a wide array of international studies, this research aims to shed light on the advantages and potential drawbacks of each method, thereby providing a more informed basis for surgical decision-making in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.
dc.description.sponsorshipNo declara
dc.identifier.doi10.7759/cureus.59404
dc.identifier.issn2168-8184
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioabierto.uantof.cl/handle/uantof/564
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceCureus Journal of Medical Science
dc.titleComparative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy in Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.volume16
organization.identifier.rorUniversidad de Antofagasta
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
236930-comparative-outcomes-of-minimally-invasive-versus-open-pancreatoduodenectomy-in-distal-cholangiocarcinoma-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis.pdf
Tamaño:
572.05 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Departamento de Ciencias médicas